Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Media

6-year-old Indian girl burned in possible caste-related violence

The story of a critically injured 6-year-old Indian girl shows the so-called Rashômon effect in action.

Here's how the same incident was reported by different news organizations:

IBN: A six-year old Dalit girl was set on fire by a man in Mathura because the girl and her mother chose to walk through a path reserved only for upper caste villagers. Even the police refused to take any action. The girl is now admitted in a hospital in Mathura and is critical.

Indo-Asian News Service: A six-year-old Dalit girl was in a serious condition in Uttar Pradesh after an eight-year-old boy pushed her into a burning heap of garbage in Mathura district. ... With her mother chasing her, [the boy] caught her and flung the girl into the fire, a police spokesperson told IANS Wednesday.

Associated Press: Police in northern India arrested a man who allegedly threw a girl into a pile of glowing embers after he caught her trespassing, an attack authorities said Wednesday may have been motivated by caste. ... [22-year-old Madan] Singh discovered the girl relieving herself Tuesday in a field he owned and demanded she immediately stop what she was doing and leave his property. "When she did not respond, he simply lifted her and threw her in a heap of embers," local police official Govind Agarwal told the Associated Press.

NDTV: A six-year-old Dalit girl in Mathura is fighting for her life after she was burnt by an upper caste man on Tuesday evening. The provocation for this brutal attack was that the child was crossing an area dominated by upper caste villagers. The attacker, Sunny, ordered her to stay away from the area and later threw her into a pile of burning waste.

Press Trust of India: A dalit girl was allegedly thrown into a fire by an 18-year-old youth who objected to her passing through a road next to his house in a hamlet, about 40 kms from this temple town. The six-year-old girl was pushed into the hot ashes of a fire on Tuesday by the youth following an altercation as she passed through the road along with her mother in Tarauli Janubi area, police sources said.


Posted by Mike Carney at 09:42 AM/ET, April 30, 2008 in Asia
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/04/6-year-old-indi.html













amytan wrote: 7h 34m ago

Nothing will come of this. As with the case in Iraq of the father killing the daughter for her relationship with a Caucasian, a UK soldier. 'operations' has it right....while Americans get all worked up and go off on moral tangents, raging about who has the "bomb", and 'savages' that don't deserve the grace of our 'help' and assistance....we are unwilling to recognize and understand the customs and mores of other cultures...and those other cultures take our moralizing, good that it be, as an affront and Western hubris. Patriarchal societies have been practicing female infanticide for centuries...India today still has many cases of wife burning by husbands and families...mostly over dowry disputes, and while there have been domestic violence laws against women, only since 2006, police rarely act on violations against women, as in many countries. China's one child policy has actually encouraged female infanticide..since amniocentesis the rate of female fetus abortions has rocketed. Americans should understand that we do not have the right to tell the world how to live...for those that think we do, we should be telling the world to live in peace...and proceed to set the example.

Monday, April 28, 2008

Iraqi kills daughter who fell in love with British soldier

Report: Iraqi kills daughter who fell in love with British soldier



Rand Abdel-Qader was put to death last month in Basra. The 17-year-old's crime? Falling in love with a 22-year-old British soldier, according to The Observer.

They met while working on a relief project late last year in the southern Iraqi city of Basra. The paper says Rand's father found out last month that his daughter had been seen talking to a man named Paul.

"He asked if it was true that she was having an affair with a British soldier. She started to cry. She was nervous and desperate. He got hold of her hair and started thumping her again and again," Leila Hussein, the teen's mother, tells the British paper. "I screamed and called out for her two brothers so they could get their father away from her. But when he told them the reason, instead of saving her they helped him end her life."

The Observer says Abdel-Qader Ali was not charged in connection with his daughter's murder.

"Not much can be done when we have an 'honor killing' case. You are in a Muslim society and women should live under religious laws," police Sgt. Ali Jabbar tells the paper. "The father has very good contacts inside the Basra government and it wasn't hard for him to be released and what he did to be forgotten. Sorry but I cannot say more about the case."

Britain's Defense Ministry tells the Press Association that it is trying to identify the soldier and confirm the report.



Jack Stilton wrote: 3h 52m ago
It's amazing that we hear about stories like this and yet all the anti-war idiots still don't "get" why we are over there.

Every single person in the west who opposes our attempt to help the Iraqi government (and in turn, the middle east) setup a more modern government deserves to be exported and subject to live the same type of life this girl was subject to.

Losers.







amytan wrote: 1h 43m ago
Jack Stilton:

Are you serious? If I am one of the "anti-war idiots", then you, by definition, are a "pro-war idiot". You are in favor of killing people in Iraq that shoot at our troops, right? That just about includes everyone in Iraq, doesn't it?

Aside from more nuanced reasons of why I think your position is grossly wrong, the glaring flaw in your premise is that when we illegally invaded Iraq ,they did not have the government of which you speak. How could we possibly "help" a government that did not exist do anything?

Further, that you would "EXport (sic) anyone, fellow Americans that believe in the very essence of democracy, which is dissent, that opposes your twisted viewpoint, to a life less than desirable, indeed, painful and miserable, begs the question of the roots of your authoritarianism.







amytan wrote: 1h 29m ago
JACK STILTON:

NEWS FLASH: 4,056 Americans have given their life in Iraq, including 4 today, HELPING a corrupt, rag-tag group of mopes that don't know what they're doing, that don't want us there and are milking us like Elsie the cow, for everything we have. But that's OK with you, isn't it Jack?



TRUTHWFREE wrote: 1h 21m ago
This is Islam at it's best. What a religion! Death to Muslim women making eyes at infidels and death for leaving Islam (no wonder few venture to leave).

We had better make sure the Islamists in this country do not gain any power and try to impose Islamic sharia law (even in their own areas as is happening in the UK). The election of Keith Ellison in Minnesota to the US Congress is scary. Swearing in on the Quran which exhorts Muslims to fight Jews and Christians until they are subdued (Sura 9-29) is equally scary. How can we allow this oath (made on the Quran which calls for fighting and subduing more than half of the population of this country)? Another Sura 9-5 calls for slaying pagans (for the non believers in this country). Bottom line, the Quran goes against the laws of our country.

I would like to see the religion outlawed in this country but I guess that's not PC (but PC will kill us).

The Caner brothers converted to Christianity in Ohio, I believe, and their Muslim cleric father would not forgive them on his death bed (see books by Ergun Caner). They got off light. The penalty for leaving Islam is death (per the Quran and hadiths). What a religion! Why can't Muslims see how EVIL Islam is and abandon it? As yes, I forget, 72 virgins.






amytan wrote: 35m ago
"We had better make sure the Christians in this country do not gain any power and try to impose Judeo-Christian law (on us)."

Abdel-Qadar Ali
Basra, Iraq

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Rice Crisis Sham

Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Fwd: Catch of the Day -- CANADIANA

I now officially declare the great rice crisis to be a sham and a fraud. All of the big three rice producing countries had bumper crops last year. Stocks are high. It is simply that their countries have declared export embargoes to see how high the price will eventually go. Shoppers at COSTCO, etc. are after the high end bhasmasti and fragrent varieties and these are in short supply. Hoarding by individual traders also contributes. The silver lining: the most affected country is Iran which consumes vast quantities of rice and grows very little of its own. Hah.

The Goracle and his foolish biofuel craze. Time for Big Al to send in his resume to Nancy and Howard and go for the Presidency again. Actually there is something called The Denver Plan which is circulating around. After the primaries are over, Big Al will declare and be supported by all of the Great and Good. Popular vote winer gets the VP "bucket of spit" as Henry Wallace described it when he was VP.

But that was not my point. Distracted. Must focus. This is a little window into how farm subsidies work and the insanity that results. And all perfectly legal. In this case we cast an eye on the biodiesel tax credit of $1 per gallon. It goes like this. You are an American corporation in the energy business. You charter a tanker and load up 10 million gallons of biofuel in Brazil. You have the boat driven to Corpus Christi. You have cunningly left room for an additional 1,000 gallons. You top the boat up with 1,000 gallons of diesel. This earns you a $10 million tax credit. You have now created 10 million gallons of blended product eligible for the tax cred. You then have the boat driven to Europe and sell the blended product there. EUros have a bigger market for diesel. Return boat to Brasil and repeat. A scam created by an IOWA senator.

It reminds me of how some oil companies used to do an in and out. We'll call it SHell Oil's shell game: short and easy to spell. Shell Oil Nigeria fills up a Shell Tanker Corporation ship which sails to one of the Caribbean islands with virtually no corporate tax. The oil is then sold to Shell Bermuda for a price close to the American price. A vast profit is realized but is largely untaxed because Bermuda don't have no stinking corporate tax. The oil now continues on to Corpus Christi where it is pumped off and sold to Shell USA but the profit is small because the price difference between Bermuda and Corpus CHristi is small. Beautiful.

Finally, I have been reading about Naples, Lord Nelson and the brief Jacobin Republic which was declared and crushed with most of the leaders hung by the mob, their livers torn out, roasted and eaten. What's your point, you may say? Well, the way they hung people was you were dropped in the conventional way and then the hangman slid down the rope onto your shoulders while his assistants pulled on your legs. Made it quick and sure. A team effort. So a perfect political cartoon came to me. Obama perched on the neck of the Democratic Party while Bill and Hill pull on the legs. Hah.










Note from Marty:

COUNTERPOINT:

1. "RICE CRISIS SHAM".....".......export embargoes to see how high the price will eventually go." Total NONSENSE.

Some facts: World rice production is in the area of 700M tonnes but the world trade market is only about 30M tonnes. Since Australia has been in the throes of a 6 year drought, their rice production is practically nil and their exports represented about 5% of the world market. The major fertilizer for rice, urea, has increased in price from 200% to 300% in the last 2 years. We all know the price of oil...and it takes a lot of fertilizer and energy to grow and harvest a rice crop. Combine these factors with billions and billions of dollars chasing hard assets as an inflation hedge, hell, the conservative CALPERS, the largest public employee retirement fund, has almost $10B invested in ag commodities..something unheard of a few years ago...mix all this with world and local speculation and you have a problem......countries then restrict their domestic growers from exporting in order to curtail local inflation and assure domestic supply...and the result is a world trade market SUPPLY constriction...its very real for those high consumption, high rice importing countries such as the Phillipines. Interestingly, Thailand, the world's #1 exporter, and the most desired strain of rice, Jasmine, is NOT restricting their exports in any manner, either is the U.S. (U.S. rice production is estimated to cost $1,200/a vs 8K# avg yield).

As to Iran, contrary to your claim that "the MOST AFFECTED country is Iran which consumes vast quantities of rice and grows VERY LITTLE OF ITS OWN." (my emphasis). This is total bullshit. The fact of the matter is that Iran is getting close to total self-sufficiency in rice production/consumption. They instituted a national improvement program, primarily aimed at modernizing rice processing facilities and minimizing waste, several years ago with this goal in mind...and at THAT TIME were producing about 78% of their rice needs..I can't imagine anyone that would consider 78% of ANYTHING as "very little"....their rice shortfall is estimated at only 450,000 tonnes, and with their money they couldn't care less what the price of rice is...there sure as hell won't be anyone going begging for rice in Iran. Incidentally, I take umbrage with your obvious glee in the prospect of Iranians suffering for lack of rice...I have no use for anyone that considers that situation being a "silver lining", that's a centuries old requisite of genocide...ask the British, they were master practitioners of the tactic. COSTCO, Wal-Mart, et al are not the expert marketers they are for nothing....tell someone he can only have so much of a staple and he'll want to hoard it..its a marketing ploy...in the long run, the U.S. per capita rice consumption isn't going to change a measurable iota...save the price of wheat/noodles keeps soaring and people buy an alternate starch... we probably waste more cooked rice than some countries eat.

The "Denver Plan" is something akin to a conspiracy theory....cooked up by people that still think a boogy man is under their beds. It ain't gonna happen. Either is a ticket with Bloomberg on it, dammit.

You should be so foolish as Al Gore. He has repeatedly cautioned against the negatives of ethanol and biofuel from discounting any benefits vis-a-vis fossil fuels...he has particularly stressed harmful emissions, destruction of rain forests, exploiting labor, etc, and the need to do things right...of course the profit motive intrinsic in corporacricies will eventually take the 'green' issue as their own and fuck it up.

Your fantasy scenario on farm subsidies, 10M gallons of Brazilian biofuel, tanker charter, Europe sale, etc is ridiculous in the extreme. I'm getting tired of this. I think lawyers can have a witness's entire testimony disregarded, thrown out or whatever..if they can impeach but one witness claim...1. where do you get $1.00 tax credit for biofuel manufactured outside of the country...for that matter, explain the $1.00 tax credit for stuff made within the country...isn't it $0.51?. 2. If you might claim that when the 1000 gallons of diesel is added to the 10M at Corpus Christie makes it a domestic manufactured fuel, the 10M gals would be subject to the import tariff of 2.5% duty PLUS $0.54/gal.. 3. What makes you think 1/10,000th blend would qualify for anything? 4. What about the EU 70% tariff on imported biofuels? 5. I don't know A. if Brazil exports biodiesel fuel..which is an oil based product, or B. if diesel fuel is compatible with ethanol. In any event, ethanol is currently $2.51/gal at the distillery, with tariffs, shipping, distribution, insurance, interest, charters, labor, back and forth across the world, taxes and god knows what else, what would the expected sale price be at retail, in what country and how would that price compare with diesel or gasoline? Don't forget the 30% or so inefficiency of ethanol vs gasoline and more for diesel.

The "in and out" shell game. You've got the gist of this right...but it is nothing new, its not a game, nor is it limited to oil companies..all mega-global companies operate with a variation of this...wouldn't you? Wouldn't you rather claim the bulk of your revenue in a low rate taxing, high inducement, abatement country, say Ireland, which is used by most hi-tech U.S. companies, then park those low taxed earnings on the Isle of Man, among other havens, which I believe has more bank repository companies than population, have your lobbies grease Congress for a waiver on the repatriation of money tax, which they do every few years, then bring the dough home? I would. What the fuck, global corporations are sovereigns unto themselves...they don't care if they make euros, swiss franks, dinars, yuans, zlotys, bahts or whatever...in fact, they prefer anything but dollars....the U.S. parent sells the components of say, a technical measuring device for $5.00, barely above cost for a net loss of, say, $0.50, to its Irish sub...which pays for it in euros....the Irish sub assembles the product and then sells it to European customers for $10.00 for, say, a 50% net margin..$2.50..and pays taxes of, say, 20% for a net profit of $2.00 which they promptly park in an interest bearing eurodollar account on the Isle of man with a few keystrokes..and that deposit not only earns interest but the exchange rate adds to their value the longer they are there....the U.S. parent reports a loss...applicable to fully diluted earnings and only repat the dough when conditions and the tax situation warrants....meanwhile benefiting from the cash flow, the leverage, the interest accumulation and the appreciated stock price of the Irish company which may enable them to buy another company and do the same thing over again. Now think in terms of Hong Kong for banking, Bejing for apparel, India for service, Malaysia for vegetable oils, Korea for computers and so on. Corporations are NOT patriotic.

As luck would have it, French Revolutionary history was my favorite undergrad class...I loved the professor, Robert Irrman, and I loved his teaching of that class...couldn't wait to get to it 3 times a week. Had I not maxed out departmental hours, 34, I would have repeated the class. Getting back to the "impeaching"....the leaders of the Jacobins "...most hung (sic) by the mob, their livers torn out, roasted and eaten." is patently FALSE. When Robespierre, schizophrenic at the end, gave his last speech to the Convention, he was so far gone and his words so threatening, to everyone, the Convention refused to print it and circulate it. Robespierre stomped out and the next day the Convention president basically told him to "shut his god damned mouth", as professor Irrman put it, in French. When Robespierre went on ranting he was arrested. Later that night his followers from the Hotel de Ville, fought with the Convention soldiers and 'rescued' Robespierre but after fighting back and forth, the Commune soldiers betrayed Robespierre and the Convention soldiers stormed his hold out at the hotel...several of the Jacobin leaders jumped out windows and impaled themselves on fencing but lived...Robespierre was shot in the jaw...I thought rather fitting...and he, along with about 20 other Jacobin leaders, were guillotined 17 days later. The Reign of Terror was over. He was not HANGED. I believe this account is indisputable...I've never heard mention of the human pate foie gras.

Everything I've read here is nothing but crackpot stuff.